Deceptive Patterns
‹ All examples Intuit

Administrative Law Judge Issues Initial Decision in FTC’s Case Against Intuit Inc.

Author
Deceptive Patterns
Date
24 Aug 2024

Order bars Intuit from engaging in deceptive practices in the future

In an initial decision announced today, the Federal Trade Commission’s Chief Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), D. Michael Chappell, ruled that Intuit Inc. (Intuit), the maker of the popular TurboTax tax filing software, “engaged in deceptive advertising in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act” and deceived consumers when it ran ads for “free” tax products and services for which many consumers were ineligible.

In ruling in favor of complaint counsel—FTC staff in the Bureau of Consumer Protection—the ALJ also found that there is a “cognizant danger of a recurring violation” by Intuit, and issued an order requiring the company to cease-and-desist from engaging in the deceptive practices alleged in the complaint.

Disclaimer: examples in the Hall of Shame are generally drawn from public submissions and cited sources; they have not been independently verified and may contain inaccuracies. They are presented as illustrations of design patterns, not findings of fact, unlawful conduct, or intent.